Disclaimer: These archives are mirrored from smsforum.net in 2007 before the forum got closed. Please only part of the forum is available here.
For any clarifications regarding these archives you can contact us at http://www.telecomspace.com/contact.

      TELECOMSPACE HOME PAGE         TELECOM DISCUSSION FORUM          CONTACT

+  SMS Forum Online Discussion
|-+  Protocols
| |-+  SMPP-V5-Related (Moderator: SMS Forum Support)
| | |-+  SMPP V5.0 Errata
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: SMPP V5.0 Errata  (Read 3572 times)
SMS Forum Support
SMS Forum Support
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1754


WWW
« on: May 22, 2003, 10:08:12 UTC »

This topic details errata found in the SMPP V5.0 specification since its release.

Section 4.1.1.1 submit_sm Syntax

Message Submission TLVs referenced at the end of PDU table should read "Message Submission Optional TLVs" to better define these TLVs as optional. The same issue applies to PDU definitions for submit_sm_resp, deliver_sm, deliver_sm_resp, data_sm, data_sm_resp, replace_sm & replace_sm_resp

Section 4.2.3.1 submit_multi Syntax

dest_address max size for distribution list is listed as 23. However the maximum length of the dl_name is 21 and dl_flag is 1.. totals 22 and not 23 as printed.

Section 4.6.1.3 query_broadcast_sm_resp Syntax
message_id is incorrectly marked as Integer type, should be C-octet string.

message_state is listed as the TLV form but refers incorrectly to section 4.7.15 instead of section 4.8.4.37.

Section 4.7.12 esm_class

esm_class field is described in a single table intended to depict the usage across all submission & delivery operations. However 2nd paragraph does not reflect this.

Text reads:
The esm_class parameter is encoded as follows in the submit_sm, submit_multi and data_sm (ESME -> MC) PDUs:

Should read:
The esm_class parameter is encoded as follows in the submit_sm, submit_multi, deliver_sm and data_sm PDUs:

Section 4.7.21 registered_delivery

Table 4-52 describes all settings for registered_delivery field. The settings for "SME originated Acknowledgement (bits 3 and 2)" are not listed as CDMA/TDMA only features.

For clarity, these rows should have the side label updated to "ANSI-41 SME originated Acknowledgement (bits 3 and 2)"

Section 4.7.23.5 Relative Time Format

Relative value ranges for Month and Day should include 0 to allow for relative times of 0 months, 0 days. Otherwise it is possible to interpret all relative times as requiring a minimum of 1 month, 1 day which restricts the feature.. that was never the intention.

YY  year (00-99) 
MM  month (01-12)  << should be 00-12
DD  day (01-31)   << should be 00-31
hh  hour (00-23)
mm  minute (00-59) 
ss  second (00-59) 

Section 4.8.4.12 broadcast_message_class

Value of class 1 should be 0x01 and not 0x02 as printed.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2007, 15:55:19 UTC by SMS Forum Support » Logged

Regards,
   Cormac Long
   Webmaster & Technical Enquiry Moderator,
   SMS Forum

Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length